|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
US
Marine shot dead by Sierra Leone Police Various groups and individuals weighed in with their views on the incident. The Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone issued a forthright statement on its Twitter site expressing concern over the shooting. In the middle of the furore the government announced a previously planned launching of sensitization for an independent Police Complaints Board, to be manned by civilians to investigate precisely such serious incidents involving the police. (You can read the statement by the Minister launching this sensitization here) The police currently man the existing complaints body, the CDIID, set up by a former Inspector-General, the Englishman Keith Biddle. Biddle had a keen eye for public relations, and at its inception the CDIID was given a high profile, but the body appears to now be moribund, and nothing has been heard from them on this matter. This is by no means the first time the police have been involved in controversies of this nature. In October 2012, police allegedly shot two youths dead in Kono, following disturbances (Read about this here) In April 2012 the Sierra Leone Police were involved in an outbreak of violence at Bumbuna town that left one person dead and about 20 injured (Read the HRCSL report on this incident here). The Kelvin Lewis investigation into the Sept 9, 2011, incident in Bo where the SLPP flagbearer was wounded had this to say about the role of the police: “…The shootings were done by the OSD personnel in Bo and it resulted in one dead and twenty three people injured including two police personnel….Witnesses say that the motor bike rider pleaded not to be shot before he was shot and killed by an OSD officer…”. In March, 2011, the Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone found police presidential bodyguards guilty of brutalizing electricity workers after a power failure during a presidential visit to the area (you can read the HRCSL statement here) What concerns natinpasadvantage most, apart from the loss of life is the presence of a police boss who appears not to understand that one of his most important roles is to establish and maintain trust between the police and civilians, and that he can best do this not by bluster and intimidation, but by patience, tact and persuasion. He can win over the civilians, whose cooperation he needs, by presenting the full facts; by acknowledging mistakes where mistakes have been made and punishing perpetrators; by having a truly independent and empowered internal police investigations procedure and by supporting an external police investigations procedure whenever necessary and particularly when it becomes clear that significant sections of the public are skeptical about the police version of a serious incident. What was clear during the course of the FM98.1 interview was that we have an old-style, one-party police chief at the helm of affairs, insensitive to human rights and the needs of modern-day police public relations. This attitude over time no doubt will filter, or has filtered, down to senior and midlevel officers and thence to the junior officers on the streets. Junior officers such as those that met up with Abdul Kamara on May 22. |
|
||||||