|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
||||
“ARCHITECTS OF A DECADE OF ACHIEVEMENT” Honourable Siaka Stevens, S.I. Koroma and C.A. Kamara-Taylor
were at the helm of these efforts, serious individuals, ruthless even in the
pursuit of their objectives. In 1978, ten years after they came to power,
they were, on the evidence of this publication, convinced that they were on
the right path to development. The document's 34 pages reveal a multitude of
development projects within a relatively short space of time. If anything,
the pace of 'development' stepped up after 1978, with the hosting of the OAU
in 1980 attended by numerous infrastructural projects that we were told would
be of lasting benefit to the country. Why did it all come to nought? By the time Siaka
Stevens left power in 1985 he knew the country was on a downward slide: the
currency was plummeting, shortages of rice, fuel and other essential
commodities were spreading and the intelligentsia were
abandoning ship. Under Stevens’ successor, Joseph Momoh,
Some of the same themes that recurred repeatedly in the seventies are still recurring; In this respect, APC2 bears some eerie similarities to APC1: much time was spent on agriculture, with regular reports of increases in agricultural production – in the case of APC1, though, the focus was more on Integrated Agricultural Development Projects than on large-scale agro-industrial farming; infrastructure, particularly roads and bridges, was high on the list of priorities; the output of the mining companies was closely watched One
problem surely with the APC modus operandi (then and now) is the notion of
'The Big Project' dreamed up at the top and hastily implemented by fiat,
without consultation or analysis. Billions of the country's Even more problematic is the whole notion of 'The Project'. APC 1, and possibly even more so APC 2, tend to see development in terms of nuts and bolts, in terms of bricks and mortar. Build a road - you have brought development. Construct an airport - you have brought development. Buy an electricity generating plant - you have brought development. Maybe, maybe not. Issues of maintenance, sustainability and internal institutional growth are very much kept to the background. The focus is very much on the wholesale purchase of a new system. If the new system collapses within a few years, then possibly you have not brought development, but retrogression. In the case of APC 1, many of the developments outlined in this document collapsed within a few years of the writing of it. It should be a cautionary tale for today's leaders. Download “Decade of Progress & Development, 1968-1978” |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|||||