You will remember how I mentioned in the last chapter that we are all
brothers in one vast family, the family of man. Now it may seem to
you that, as time goes on, this family is breaking up into ever smaller
parts. This is quite true politically, that is in the way we are
governed. There are
more self-governing nations in the world today (over 100) than there
have ever
been, and their number is likely to continue to increase. The Roman
Empire and
the British Empire are only two of the many large groups out of which
dozens of
separate states have been created.
But culturally, that is in the way we live, the human family has drawn
closer
together throughout its history, slowly at first, and now with
increasing speed.
Two thousand years ago, the way of life of a citizen of Rome was
completely
different from that of a citizen of, say, Zaria. Today, in both Rome
and Zaria you
will find people who dance to jazz music, profess Christianity, study
in a
university, and find that life is very difficult when their telephone
is out of order.
The rhythms of jazz originated amongst Africans; Christianity, like so
many
other great religions, sprang up amongst Asians; the idea of a
university was
conceived by Europeans; and the telephone was developed by an American.
Yet
all four now belong to the world, and to the common cultural heritage
of the
family of man. The rest of this book is really an account of the way in
which our
people here in West Africa have gradually contributed more and more to,
and
benefited more and more from, that common heritage.
Fifty centuries ago, when the scattered tribes of Europe were still
illiterate and barbarous, there lived in a fertile river valley in the
north-east corner of our continent a people who had a very advanced
civilization. That river was the Nile, and the people were the
Egyptians. Very few of them were negroes; and, fascinating as it is, we
cannot stop to study that civilization here. It has, however, one
lesson to teach which I must refer to at this stage of our study.
It is that the finest civilizations have usually sprung from the most
fertile soils, almost literally. Men's culture is rooted in their land.
Each summer the Nile valley becomes a shallow lake, whose receding
waters leave behind a layer of extremely fertile silt. It is not
surprising, therefore, that many adventurous people from both Asia and
Africa (including, quite possibly, some negroes) converged on this
valley, which was conveniently placed near the land bridge linking the
two continents. Intermingling, they formed a new race with relatively
few material worries, and so plenty of leisure to give to other things.
They painted the walls of their caves, some of them with negro
subjects. They built the Sphinx and the Pyramids. And they produced a
supreme achievement when they taught themselves to write in a kind of
picture language called hieroglyphics.
Not far away from Egypt, in Mesopotamia, was to be found another great
home of early civilization. Here too we find that the roots sank into
fertile riverain soil, which had attracted energetic people.
Mesopotamia, 'the country between the rivers', lies, green and rich,
between the Euphrates and the Tigris. In about the twentieth century
before Christ, it was occupied by a people called the Sumerians. They
developed an early form of writing too, using wedge-shaped letters
called 'cuneiform' letters, after the Latin word 'cuneus' - a wedge.
Neither of these two highly civilized peoples was negro. The people of
West Africa, on the other hand, nearly all belong to the negro race.
Negroes are the original natives of the African continent. Today they
share it with many non-negro people. Some, like the Jews of North
Africa and the Berbers of North-West Africa, have lived on the
continent for at least 5,000 years. Others, like the Arabs who are now
to be found all along the north coast, did not cross the land bridge
from Asia to Africa until the seventh century A.D. and later. Yet
others, like the Europeans of Algeria, South Africa, and East and
Central Africa, have entered our continent only during the past few
hundred years. The negroes alone, who are today found in large numbers
between latitudes 18° and 4° N, and particularly in the western end of
that strip, cannot be proved ever to have entered Africa as a race,
either by sea or land. They have apparently always been here. And it is
that western end of that strip, in which our race is massed, that we
call today West Africa.
However, the West African negro has had his history and way of life
very greatly changed by the non-negro people with whom he has come into
contact. Some of these have reached our country overland, others have
come from overseas. All have left their mark on us. Unfortunately, a
heavy curtain hangs over much of our history before these contacts with
foreign peoples began. In
spite of the difficult climate to which I have referred, and the
absence of river
valleys as fertile as those which supported the civilizations of Egypt
and
Mesopotamia, our ancestors were able to produce the Nok figurines 2,000
years
ago. But the art of writing, which is the supreme achievement of any
civilization,
negroes, like Europeans, had to be taught by others. With the exception
of the
Hausas1 and the Kotoko tribe from the Lake Chad area, both of whose
languages
were written with Arabic characters, and the Vai of Liberia, other West
African
tribes had to wait for the arrival of Europeans before learning to
record their
words on paper.
Travel is easy in Europe, and difficult in Africa. So even this new
literacy,
once taught, spread quickly in the former continent, but slowly in the
latter,
before modern times brought the defeat of the tropical forest and
desert by the
train, the car, and the aeroplane. Thus it happens that we must look to
the
writings of others to lift the curtain for us, as we enter modern times.
This method of discovering the early history of our people is not of
course as
satisfactory as using the written records of a people themselves.
Provided
however that we constantly check and cross-check what we read against
what
archaeology has to tell us, we can learn a great deal from the accounts
of foreign
travellers to our lands. We must also of course compare what these
accounts
contain with what we know of West African life today, and try to trace
lines of
development.
The Greeks and Romans of classical times were amongst the first of
these
travellers. They were very careful to distinguish between the negro and
the nonnegro
inhabitants of Africa. Herodotus, for example, uses the term
'Ethiopians'
for all the inhabitants of Africa outside Egypt. But he makes a further
division.
'The Ethiopians,' he writes, 'from the direction of the sunrising (for
the
Ethiopians were in two bodies) were in no way different in appearance
from the
other Ethiopians, but in their language and in the nature of their hair
only: for the
Ethiopians from the East are straight-haired, but those of Libya have
hair more
thick and woolly than that of any other men.' By 'Libya' here we know
Herodotus meant Africa south and west of Egypt.
He then describes the voyage of certain Phoenician sailors round
'Libya'.
'They set forth from the Erythraian Sea and sailed through the Southern
Sea; and
when autumn came, they would put to shore and sow the land, wherever in
Libya
they might happen to be as they sailed, and then they waited for the
harvest: and
having reaped the corn they would sail on, so that after two years had
elapsed, in
the third year they turned through the Pillars of Hercules and arrived
again in Egypt. And they reported a thing which I cannot believe, but
another man may,
namely that in sailing round Libya they had the sun on their right
hand.'
You will see at once that this early (perhaps first) circumnavigation
of Africa
must have been done in a clock-wise direction. And the fact that the
historian
who recorded it for us notes that the sun was on the ship‘s starboard
side for
much of the time, even though he finds it incredible, encourages us to
go on and
read further.
A certain Sataspes, he tells us, was sentenced by his king, Xerxes of
Persia, to
circumnavigate Africa as a penance for a sin he had committed. He did
not
complete the journey; but he did report seeing 'at the furthest point
which he
reached . . . a dwarfish people, who used clothing made from the palm
tree, and
who, whenever they' (Sataspes' crew) 'came to land with their ship,
left their
town and fled to the mountains'.
Herodotus' longest and most interesting
account
of
Africa, however, is
contained in his description of an overland expedition, not a sea
voyage. This
expedition was the third sent out by King Cambyses of Persia, in about
520 B.C.
Its members were trying to reach the land of 'the long-lived Ethiopians
by the
Southern Sea'. Cambyses decided first to send spies to this unknown
land, 'both
to see whether the table of the Sun existed really, which is said to
exist among
the Ethiopians, and in addition to spy out all else, but pretending to
be bearers of
gifts for their king. . . . So when Cambyses had resolved to send the
spies,
forthwith he sent for . . . men . . . who understood the Ethiopian
tongue. . . . He
sent them to the Ethiopians, enjoining them what they should say and
giving
them gifts to bear with them, that is to say a purple garment, and a
collar of
twisted gold with bracelets, and an alabaster box of perfumed ointment,
and a jar
of palm-wine...The
Ethiopian, however, perceiving that they had come as spies, spoke to
them as
follows: "Neither did the King of the Persians send you bearing gifts
because he
thought it a matter of great moment to become my guest-friend, nor do
ye speak
true things (for ye come as spies of my kingdom), nor again is he a
righteous
man; for if he had been righteous he would not have coveted a land
other than his
own, nor would he be leading away into slavery men at whose hands he
has
received no wrong. Now however give him this bow and speak to him these
words: The King of the Ethiopians gives this counsel to the King of the
Persians,
that when the Persians draw their bows (of equal size to mine) as
easily as I do
this, then he should march against the long-lived Ethiopians, provided
he be
superior to them in numbers; but until that time he should feel
gratitude to the
gods that they do not put it into the mind of the sons of the
Ethiopians to acquire
another land in addition to their own."'
Even through this old translation you will gain a vivid impression of
the
respect in which the 'Ethiopians' were held not only by the Persians,
but by the
writer. There is certainly no suggestion here that Cambyses had sent
his envoys
to 'civilize' an inferior people...There were later classical writers
about negro kingdoms, however, who had a
less flattering tale to tell. Strabo, who lived in Italy at the time of
Christ, and 400
years after Herodotus the Greek, states that...
These glimpses of Africa in classical times are very
tantalizing, partly because
they are so fleeting, partly because we do not know exactly what parts
of the
continent they are unveiling to us, and partly because, mixed in with
what we
know from modern West African life are accurate descriptions, we find
some
fantastic untruths - accounts in Pliny of 'men who do not live beyond
their
fortieth year', for example. If we bear in mind who wrote them and when
they
were written, however, these travellers' tales of classical times can
provide us
with a useful background against which to study in more detail the West
Africa
of more recent times.