Suddenly Sierra Leone Government Faces
a Vast, New Challenge
On Wednesday, September 16 this
year, a heavy downpour flooded Freetown. An unknown (or unannounced)
number of people lost their lives, some swept away by the rushing
waters. Houses were engulfed, some carried away, leaving thousands
homeless. The government asked those affected to register at the city's
two stadiums, and some 10,000 reported themselves affected,
many of them currently camped at the stadiums.
The government has announced plans to resettle the flood-affected, and
has identified land on the outskirts of the Western Area for a new
settlement.
The immediate problem is the feeding, clothing, shelter and eventual
rehousing of those affected, but this is only the tip of the
iceberg. Many tens of thousands more still live in vulnerable areas.
This year's flooding has finally brought home the realisation that
heavy rains in Freetown could bring widespread death and destruction.
In truth it is not a problem that has arisen overnight. Environmental
experts and longtime Freetown residents have for years warned about the
consequences of massive deforestation of Freetown's
hills and
uncontrolled growth and multiplication of slum communities in low-lying
areas. In recent years,
various world disaster preparednes reports place Sierra Leone as one of
the most vulnerable countries to natural disaster. Freetown, with the highest rainfall in
West Africa, and
with mountains rising steeply above it to 2000 ft has always had to
cope with huge amounts of water in the rainy season. The deluge was
mitigated over the centuries by the thick vegetation of the coastal
mountains. Over the last two or three decades this has steadily been
eroded by new, often unplanned construction in the hills. Where once
vegetation held the waters back and released it slowly, now brown
muddy waters rush down in a torrent, sweeping all before them. Some of
Freetown's major thoroughfares are quickly submerged during a downpour,
making movement and even ground-floor occupation hazardous,
How much might the current disaster cost the Government of Sierra
Leone? It has now assumed the responsibility of feeding and sheltering
some 10,000 flood-affected. Assuming minimal costs of Le10,000 per day
per head, the daily bill would be some Le100,000,000.00. The monthly
bill would be some 3 billion leones, approximately 500,000 United
States dollars. This is money the Sierra Leone government can ill
afford to lose, and at some point it must take steps to see the
displaced rehoused and fending for themselves. Assuming it were
to build 1000 low cost houses for them (say 8 or 10 per family),
at the very low cost of Le10,000,000.00 per unit, the total cost would
be some 10 billion leones or 2 million dollars.
These very conservative figures
would impose a strain on the government
budget, but somehow or other it would muddle through, as it has always
done. As has now become almost normal, an emergency bank account has
been opened for donations to the disaster-relief effort. However, this
does not begin to address the problem. There are
tens of thousands more, (no one really knows how many) currently
living in these vulnerable communities, with more moving in by the day.
Meanwhile, up in the hills, construction continues apace. Unless strong
action is taken immediately, the problem is certain to grow worse. Each
fresh downpour brings with it a new apprehension. The midday rains of
September 16, sustained but not exceptionally heavy, were a potent
warning of what might come.
The problem is not simply an environmental or disaster-relief question.
Decades of government inaction have led to the mushrooming of slum
communities all along Freetown's coastline. These communities, filled
with jobless youth, are potential breeding grounds of crime, disease
and political violence. Many believe that the majority
of the lower income groups that live in these communities are
supporters of the APC, the self-styled party of the masses. The APC has
done little to discourage migration into Freetown and the expansion of
these
communities despite the protests
of longtime residents. Freetown has more and more become the central
battleground of national elections. Whichever party carries Freetown is
likely to carry the nation. The suspicion has long been that in its
desire to win Freetown, the APC has encouraged its supporters to move
into Freetown, and to erect homes and set up stalls for trading more or
less as they please.
The disaster points to an even more fundamental question, one that
strikes at the very heart of Sierra Leone's problems, and one that the
authorities would like to avoid at all cost. Why do Sierra Leoneans
demonstrate such an overwhelming desire to move to the city, even into
its dangerous, unhealthy slums? What is it
that attracts them so? Conversely, what is it about their rural
communities that they are fleeing? Why can they not carve out an
independent, productive life within their original rural communities?
Politicians in Sierra Leone have avoided answering these questions for
decades. The raging waters from the Peninsula Mountains may finally
force
an answer.