We extend our previous
analysis of
Freetown's population increase by including figures from 1901 onwards. The
colonial government conducted regular censuses of the Colony's
population from the
city's inception. After the establishment of the protectorate in 1896,
when the territory now known as Sierra Leone officially came under a
single administration, estimates were made of the protectorate
population, but full censuses were carried out only in the Colony
(Freetown peninsula). It was only after Independence that the first
full census of the entire country was conducted, in 1963.
The added data reveals a very sharp increase in the rate of growth of
Freetown's population after about 1960, ie at the dawn of Independence.
For the 52-year period between the 1963 and 2015 censuses, Freetown's
annual growth rate was 4% and the population increased more than seven
fold. For the 62-year period between the 1901 and 1963 censuses,
Freetown's annual growth rate was 1.7% and the population increased
less than three fold. For the 30-year period between the 1901 and 1931
censuses, Freetown's annual growth rate was 0.8% and the population
increased by less than a third of its original value. Many modern-day economists view urban
migration in
third-world countries favourably, but the data indicates that the
British colonial government certainly did not encourage it.
1901
1911
1921
1931
1963
1974
1985
2004
2015
Western Area
Total
67782
68115
79561
86505
195023
316312
554243
947122
1500234
Note: Figures for 1901 to 1931
exclude Sherbro and Tassoh Island, which were then administratively
under the Western Area. The figures for these years were taken from
Sierra Leone Blue Books,
various years, by kind courtesy of the Sierra Leone National Archives.
There was
also a census conducted in 1948, for which figures were unavailable.
Figures for 1963 to 2015 are available from Statistics
Sierra Leone.
The new data raises interesting questions: what caused this sharp
increase in Freetown's growth rate around Independence? Was it simply
the euphoria of Independence, somehow maintained 50 plus years later?
Was it caused by active encouragement of migration by subsequent
administrations? For what purpose? Conversely, if one takes
the view that dual economic systems within a single national
jurisdiction will naturally encourage migration,
how were the British able to restrict urban migration so successfully
during their administration? Was it through housing and land
policy? Street trading policy? Vagrancy laws? Or some combination
of all of these.