By Arthur Abraham, Teachers Training College, Magburaka
and
Barry Isaac
Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon
One of the best-known of the late
19th-century warrior-chiefs of the
former Protectorate is Kailondo, the founder of Kailahun, present
District Headquarters of Kailahun District, Eastern Province. The
earliest published reference to him appears in the memoirs of
Alldridge.1 Later, District Commissioner
Hollins2 treated at length
Kailondo’s prominent position in the history of Luawa Chiefdom, the
largest Chiefdom of Kailahun District.
Reverend
Clarke3collected additional data during
the
1930’s and subsequently
published his Story of Kailondo and Ndawa in 1957. More recently, the
eminent historian Christopher Fyfe has included a sketch of
Kailondo in
his writings. Fyfe draws heavily on the writings of Alldridge.4
In this Research Note we shall examine first the possible biases in the
earlier accounts and then contrast the published materials with
accounts that we have collected from living informants who remember
Kailondo and the events of his time.5
1Alldridge (or ‘Big Neck,’ as
he is still called by the oldsters of
Kailahun District) first met Kailondo in 1890. This early meeting was
an outgrowth of the Berlin West Africa Conference (1884-5),
at which the principle of ‘effective occupation’ was decreed the basis
for the balkanization of West Africa. The purpose of Alldridge’s 1890
expedition into what later became the Sierra Leone Protectorate was to
secure for Britain the requisite Treaties of Protection from Chiefs —
and to secure them before the French could expand into that territory.
In Kailondo, Alldridge found a local sovereign who recognised clearly
the advantages of currying British favour. Kailondo requested that
‘Frontiers’ (West African Frontier Force) be stationed at Kailahun,
even though that town was at the time part of Liberia. Alldridge
readily granted the request. From this happy meeting of minds emerged
Alldridge’s laudatory descriptions of Kailondo-: ‘Certainly he was one
of the most intelligent chiefs I ever met; powerful . . . but capable
of understanding what was for the lasting interest of his people, and
universally beloved for miles around.’6
Or, again: ‘Kailondo was a truly sagacious and far-sighted ruler, and
is still
remembered with affection and respect’7
In contrast Alldridge’s description of another chief who
was less
impressed by the ‘urgency’ of Britain’s grand colonial design is worthy
of note. Of the latter chief, Niagwa, he writes. ‘This Niagwa was a
most arrogant man, who did not always observe sufficient courtesy
towards the British Government, although he required to be treated with
much ceremony himself.’8 One could well
doubt the objectivity of some
of Alldridge’s assessments of character.
Nearly three decades after Alldridge published his first
memoir, N C.
Hollins wrote his ‘Short History of Luawa Chiefdom.’ Hollins collected
much of his data about Kailondo from the then Paramount Chief of Luawa,
the late Momo Banya, who was the son of Kailondo — and hence, scarcely
an unbiased source. Hollins provides a lengthy account of the First
Kpove War (circa 1880), which commenced, he tells us, with the invasion
of the great warrior Ndawa, who burnt Manowa, took Pendembu and Mendi,
and eventually grappled with Kailondo at Kenewa and Ngiehun. In this
account, Kailondo emerges the gallant young knight who ‘...rid the
country of the freebooter...’ (p. 15). Hollins gives a brief account of
Kailondo’s subsequent plundering of the countryside, mentioning that he
took ‘...much spoil of wives, slaves, cattle, many cloths and a
carronade...’ (p. 19). Nowhere does Hollins mention human carnage or
human sacrifice, which we believe played a prominent role in Kailondo’s
administration of Luawa. What Hollins does note is that although some
of Kailondo’s Kpelle slaves ‘...sighed for human flesh... they were not
allowed this horrid diet within the Kailahun warfence’ (p. 19).
6A
Tramsformed Colony, op. cit., pp. 180-81. 7 ibid.,
p. 199. 8ibid.,
p. 177.
Reverend Clarke presents us a different version of the First Kpove War.
In his account, this War originated in a feud between the Warrior Ndawa
and Chief Gbenya of Blama. Chief Gbenya fled north and east from Blama,
and Ndawa pursued him. Ndawa invited Kailondo to join in the pursuit,
and a temporary alliance was formed between these two warriors.
Together they set out burning and
ravaging the whole country. Gbenya,
however, escaped and Kai determined to return home to Luawa, especially
on account of the many quarrels which arose between his followers and
those of Ndawa... (Kailondo) set off back to Mafindo, destroying all
bridges en route to prevent Ndawa following him. The enraged Ndawa
determined to teach Kai a lesson and made preparations to carry war
into Luawa.9
Ndawa moved to Sakabu (the village that later grew
into present-day Kailahun)
and formed an alliance with some of the local chiefs, who convened at
Ngiehun
(a town between Sakabu and Pendembu). Kailondo likewise gathered a
following and marched on Ngiehun. The ensuing struggle, described in
detail by Hollins10 and again by
Reverend Clarke, resulted in the downfall of Ndawa and the ascendancy
of
Kailondo. Reverend Clarke’s description of Kailondo’s administration of
Luawa Chiefdom draws heavily on the early memoir of Alldridge,11
whose
laudatory descriptions of Kailondo are quoted at length.
Our own field experience indicates that one can expect
informants
from Kailahun to support Hollins’ version of the struggle between
Kailondo and Ndawa; whereas the elders of Jawi and other outlying areas
will tend to buttress Reverend Clarke’s account. An important addendum
to the view of the latter group is that one point of
friction between the two warriors involved the dividing of the booty —
Kailondo felt that Ndawa cheated him! In short, one version stresses
the
chivalry of the conflict; the other, the meanness. Further research
might reveal still other variations.
There are also several versions of Kailondo’s burial.
Alldridge states
that the warrior’s burial place was a carefully guarded secret.12
Hollins
reports that Kailondo died at Dukonko (Guinea) and was first buried
there; but that later the body was removed to Sakona (Guinea) and still
later to Komaru (Luawa, near Mano).13 Reverend
Clarke
states that Kailondo died at Lukono
9 Clarke, op. cit., p. 248. 10op. cit.,
pp. 14-15. 11 The Sherbro...,
op. cit. 12 A Transformed
Colony, op. cit., p. 199. 13 op. cit.,
p. 20.
(Guinea), his fatherland; but that the body was subsequently removed to
Sakona; then to Magbalu, his motherland; and finally to Komalu
(Komaru),
Kai’s
fatherland.14 Accounts from our own
informants include all these
variations. An interesting sidelight is offered by Rev. Clarke’s
account
of the burial itself: ‘...as was their custom, his people placed about
£12
in the grave together with many country cloths, brass bowls, and
boxes.’15 One of our informants insisted that
twelve male slaves were
sacrificed and buried with Kailondo.
Of perhaps greater significance is that our informants do
not
corroborate the published materials that portray Kailondo as a chief
who was ‘...universally beloved for miles around...’16
Our data do
confirm, however, that Kailondo was ‘...a chief who was never spoken of
except in the highest terms.’17 To quote one
informant: ‘Kai was in
those days so powerful that nothing occurred that did not come to his
ears. When anyone said anything against him, Kai would seek him out and
seize him by the arm and say, “Now I shall deal with you.” Death seems
to have been the usual penalty for failure to speak in the ‘highest
terms.’
Kailondo took great numbers of slaves, reportedly from
within his own
Chiefdom as well as from other chiefdoms. The informant quoted above
continues:
People were just like fowl to him — he
was so powerful. He sacrificed
them whenever he felt like it. When Kailondo brought in slaves, he put
them in a special house. His praise-singers would beat small drums and
cry out, “From all these slaves, would you not like to take some out ?”
Kailondo would then call them out one-by-one. As each emerged, Kailondo
would strike him on the head with a club, which was to say, “You will
not live. You will go to Yigindi (sacrificial spot on the Moa River)”
Kai once took three hundred slaves there, telling them, “I shall take
you into my Society.” Upon arriving, he sacrificed two hundred and
ninety of them and threw their bodies into the river. The remaining ten
returned with him to Kailahun
The above and similar accounts shed doubt on Fyfe’s appraisal of
Kailondo: “Though so famous in war he was kind and gentle in manner and
merciful to his enemies.”18 Our informants
are unanimous in stressing
the terror that Kailondo inspired and the
14.op. cit.,
pp. 251. 15. id. 16. Alldridge, A Transformed Colony, op. cit., p.
181 17. id. 18.Short
History..., op. cit., p. 128.
ruthlessness with which he dealt with all opponents and personal
enemies. A not untypical instance was his treatment of the Chiefs of
Ngiema, who had sympathised with Ndawa: As a public spectacle Kailondo
bound them, tied heavy stones about their necks and threw them into
the River Keeya. In another instance he displayed his displeasure with
three Gbandi chiefs who had harboured one of Ndawa’s lieutenants and
who had refused to surrender him, by razing all the towns in Gbandi
country and taking home much booty and slaves.
In summary, the elders whom we have interviewed have
portrayed Kailondo
in a light not encountered in the two major (and semi-official)
accounts19 and the subsequent writings based
on them. Interestingly, our
informants’ accounts of the rough-and-tumble struggles that followed
the social turmoil fostered by European contact and the widespread
introduction of firearms into the Protectorate of Sierra Leone,
generally agree with d’Azevedo’s careful reconstruction of the
(19th-century) history of the adjacent Liberian hinterland.20
Further,
the accounts of human sacrifice suggest an interesting link between the
history of 19th- century hinterland Sierra Leone and that of the great
Empires to the south.21
The European Conquest of upcountry Sierra Leone occurred
within the
lifetime of the oldest resident of the former Protectorate. These
surviving elders are an invaluable source of data about pre-colonial
society and culture. Unless this information is collected within the
next few years — while these elders can
19. Alldridge, op. cit.; Hollins, op. cit. What is probably the
preliminary draft of District Commissioner Hollins' article is a letter
(dated 24 May 1924) which he sent to the Provincial Commissioner, with
refererence to a chieftain succession dispute in Luawa. The letter may
be found in the District Archives at Kailahun, in an uncatalogued file
of miscellaneous correspondence for the years 1924 through the early
1930’s. 20. Warren L. d’Azevedo, “The Setting of Gola Society and
Culture: Some Theoretical Implications of Variation in Time and Space.”
Kroeber
Anthropological Society, no. 21, 1959, pp. 43-125. 21. We are indebted to Dr. Milan Kalous, Department of
History, Fourah
Bay College, for his helpful suggestions and for his generous
permission to read a manuscript that he is preparing for publication,
“Human Sacrifice in Benin History.” Of interest is the parallel use of
the club to strike the heads of the intended sacrificial victims.
Even after the colonial administration had put an end to
large-scale human sacrifice in the Sierra Leone Protectorate, the
sacrificial sites
were (and are) still used for ritual offerings of foodstuffs. Yigindi,
mentioned above, was and is the most famous of these sites along the
Moa River in Kailahun District.
still be consulted, and before the published accounts influence oral
renditions — whole chapters of the history of Sierra Leone will forever
be based on the frequently biased and flimsy accounts of early European
travellers and administrators.
22. Abraham hopes to secure funds for an extensive
survey of oral
history in Kailahun District.