Two years ago we
reported on the 2013 WHO maternal
mortality report then just released by the WHO, which placed Sierra
Leone at the bottom of the world ranking. We also ran an interview
with
Sierra Leone's Chief Medical Officer
in which he defended his
ministry's record and asserted that improvements were being made.
Sierra Leone's then Minister of Health, Miatta Kargbo, describing the
findings as not a true indication of the effectiveness of the
government's Free Health Care Initiative, FHCI, a costly government
program targeted at pregnant women, lactating mothers and under-five
children. Two
years on, the WHO
has released the 2015 edition of the maternal
mortality report and Sierra Leone again finds itself at the bottom
of
the ranking. Indeed, Sierra Leone's Maternal Mortality Ratio, MMR,
actually deteriorated in the two year period, from 1100 to 1360
maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. The gap between Sierra Leone
and the rest of the world increased significantly: this time round the
second-to-last country was the Central African Republic, with an MMR of
881. In 2013, this
position was held by Chad, with an MMR of 980. Improving maternal
health is one of the Millenium Development Goals adopted in 2000 by all
UN member states.
In 2014 government officials including the Minister of Health and the
Chief Medical Officer defended the performance of the Ministry of
Health, whilst not disputing the WHO's figures. This time round the
reaction has been more muted, and some sections of the government
appear to be questioning the WHO's findings, even though the results
are substantially based on figures provided by the
self same government. The deputy
Minister of Health, Madinatu Rahman in the regular Sierra Leone
Broadcasting Corporation press conference of June 2 claimed that the
figures were not accurate. The 2015 report takes pains to stress the
efforts that have been made to ensure that its findings are accurate
and internationally comparable:
"Given
the challenges of obtaining accurate and standardized direct measures
of maternal mortality, the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency
Group (MMEIG) – comprising the World Health Organization (WHO), the
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA), World Bank Group and the United Nations Population
Division (UNPD) – partnered with a team at the University of
Massachusetts Amherst, United States of America (USA), the National
University of Singapore, Singapore, and the University of California at
Berkeley, USA, to generate internationally comparable MMR estimates
with independent advice from a technical advisory group that includes
scientists and academics with experience in measuring maternal
mortality."
Amongst African countries, the report highlights Cape Verde and
Rwanda for having achieved the relevant Millenium Development Goal of a
75% reduction in the MMR between 1990 and 2015. Rwanda, facing some criticism nowadays for a perceived undemocratic administration, is
particularly noteworthy for having reduced a very high MMR of
1300 in 1990 to just 290 in 2015. Sierra Leone's
neighbours, Guinea and Liberia, similarly affected by Ebola in 2014 and
2015, have recorded MMRs of 679 and 725, approximately half the Sierra
Leonean rate. Gambia is recorded with a rate of 706, Nigeria 814 and
Ghana 319. By contrast the best performing countries in the world,
Poland, Iceland, Greece and Finland, have Maternal Mortality Rates of
just 3 deaths per 100,000 live births.
The continuing failure to show significant improvement in the MMR
figures is an acute embarrassment, not only to the Sierra Leone
government but to the international community, which has poured many
millions of dollars into the campaigh to improve health indicators and
outcomes in Sierra Leone. The WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and DFID, amongst
others, were all
enthusiastic participants in the free healthcare programme, FHCI, which
was
launched with much fanfare by President Ernest Bai Koroma in 2010. In
the early years of the program it was very often touted as one of the
government's major successes. The
specific goal was to bring about improvements in health outcomes
for pregnant women, lactating mothers and new-born children by
providing them with free medical care, including drugs. From the start
the program was beset by problems, with frequent allegations that
drugs, often purchased by international partners, ended up being sold
in pharmacies even whilst the clinics providing the supposedly-free
health care
service were turning away patients in need of drugs. As far back as
2011, Amnesty
International issued a report
calling for the government to strengthen monitoring and accountability
within the program so as to stop people who "exploit the system and
plunder valuable medicines".
Quite apart from the issue of the availability of free drugs, the
Maternal Mortality Rate is intricately linked with the MCH service
in Sierra Leone. The government’s front line troops in the fight to
combat maternal mortality around the country are its Maternal and Child
Health (MCH) Aides. They enter the medical field at a lower level than
regular nurses and are trained specifically for ante- and post-natal
care (ANC, PNC). They man hundreds of MCH Posts all around the country
that provide basic ANC and PNC for the great majority of rural
communities. They are trained to refer patients to higher-level
institutions at the first sign of serious complication. There are
indications that all has not been well with the MCH program for a good
number of years. We will explore this in our next health report.